Rebuttal of Miskolczi alternative greenhouse theory
dodano: 2010-11-04
Miskolczi theorizes that atmospheric CO2 increases cannot lead to an enhanced greenhouse effect and therefore cannot be a cause of global warming. Rob van Dorland and Piers M. Forster show his theory to be incorrect both in its application of radiation theory and from direct atmospheric observations.
Miskolczi's theory in a very complicated way explains that the greenhouse gas effect of CO2 is compensated by decrease of water vapour. In other words CO2 does not lead to substantial raise in temperatures. After many consultations with leading scientists it became clear the the Miskolczi theory is very weak and is not based on any serious science. Nevertheless climate sceptics in Hungary but also in the Netherlands and other countries are using the theory more and more actively. Carbon intensive lobbies are also inviting Miskolczi supporters to speak at their conferences.
Ferenc Miskolczi uses complex radiative transfer calculations on 228 measured atmospheric profiles of temperature and greenhouse gases to theorize "physical rules" for the Earth’s energy balance.
The document was published on the site of the Hungarian Meteorological Institute.
The authors, Rob van Dorland and Piers M. Forster are leading scientists in the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute and the School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. They are also IPCC lead authors.
Ferenc Miskolczi uses complex radiative transfer calculations on 228 measured atmospheric profiles of temperature and greenhouse gases to theorize "physical rules" for the Earth’s energy balance.
The document was published on the site of the Hungarian Meteorological Institute.
The authors, Rob van Dorland and Piers M. Forster are leading scientists in the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute and the School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. They are also IPCC lead authors.
« Back















